The Science of Learning

Why you must be using retrieval practice as the backbone of the student experience.

February 17, 2025

Unlocking Student Potential: Applying the Science of Learning in K-12 Education

When I was in the central office at Concord Community Schools, we embarked on a bold initiative that would ultimately yield some of the best student achievement growth in the state. We introduced curriculum maps aligned to four-week common assessments—what we called "short-cycle assessments." At first, the idea that frequent testing could drive learning seemed counterintuitive—shouldn't teaching be the priority? But the research told a different story. Inspired by a chart in Robert Marzano’s The Art and Science of Teaching, which demonstrated that more tests led to greater learning, I made it the foundation of our research basis. However, I could not explain why more testing led to more learning, but the results spoke for themselves: over five years, we climbed to the 92nd percentile in student achievement growth. Yet, even as I presented the data to staff, I struggled to articulate why it worked—until I discovered the science of learning and the concept of retrieval practice. That was the missing piece that made everything click.

The Science Behind Effective Learning

Recent advances in cognitive psychology provide clear, research-backed strategies that improve student learning. Books like Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning by Peter Brown, Henry Roediger, and Mark McDaniel distill decades of research into practical applications for the classroom. The key takeaway? Learning happens best when students are required to actively retrieve information rather than passively review it.

Retrieval Practice: The Power of Testing

One of the most well-documented and transformative principles in cognitive science is retrieval practice. The act of recalling information from memory—whether through quizzes, writing summaries, or self-explaining concepts—not only strengthens retention but also reshapes how the brain encodes knowledge for long-term use. Decades of rigorous research have shown that retrieval practice significantly outperforms passive study techniques like rereading or highlighting.

Studies demonstrate that frequent, low-stakes testing enhances long-term retention, reduces forgetting, and enables students to transfer knowledge across different contexts. Unlike rote memorization, retrieval practice forces learners to reconstruct knowledge, deepening their understanding and improving their ability to apply what they know. This active engagement with material leads to more durable learning gains, better problem-solving skills, and increased academic confidence.

Furthermore, retrieval practice combats the illusion of mastery that often comes with passive review. When students are required to recall information without external cues, they develop a more accurate sense of what they truly understand and where they need further reinforcement. Educators who implement retrieval-based learning strategies—such as frequent, formative assessments and cumulative reviews—report measurable improvements in student outcomes, with gains that persist well beyond standardized testing scenarios.

In short, retrieval practice is not just another study technique; it is a powerful, research-backed method that fundamentally enhances the way students learn. Its effectiveness is so well established that it should be a core instructional strategy in every classroom. The act of recalling information from memory—whether through quizzes, writing summaries, or self-explaining concepts—strengthens retention far more than rereading or highlighting material. Research shows that frequent, low-stakes testing enhances long-term retention and helps students transfer knowledge to new contexts.

Spaced and Interleaved Practice: Learning That Lasts

Instead of cramming, students benefit from spacing out their study sessions over time. This technique, known as spaced practice, allows for some forgetting to occur, making subsequent retrieval efforts more effective. Similarly, interleaving—mixing different types of problems or concepts—helps students recognize underlying patterns and apply knowledge flexibly.

Direct Instruction: Structuring Learning for Success

Research supports structured, explicit teaching methods such as Direct Instruction (DI), which breaks down learning into carefully sequenced steps with guided practice and immediate feedback. DI has consistently been shown to outperform other instructional methods, particularly for disadvantaged students.

Classroom Applications: Moving from Theory to Practice

1. Frequent, Low-Stakes Quizzing

  • Replace high-pressure unit tests with regular, formative assessments.

  • Encourage students to quiz themselves using flashcards or practice problems.

2. Cumulative Review

  • Revisit key concepts throughout the year instead of isolating them within a single unit.

  • Structure homework to reinforce past lessons rather than only focusing on new content.

3. Active Engagement Strategies

  • Use student-led discussions, concept mapping, and problem-solving tasks to promote retrieval practice.

  • Incorporate peer teaching, where students explain concepts to one another.

4. Strategic Lesson Planning

  • Implement direct instruction techniques to introduce new material clearly and systematically.

  • Follow up with guided and independent practice to reinforce learning.

The Road Ahead: Transforming Education with Science

Adopting evidence-based teaching practices requires a shift in mindset—from focusing solely on instructional delivery to prioritizing how students encode and retrieve information. Traditional educational models often emphasize content coverage rather than learning durability. By aligning our practices with the science of learning, we can ensure that students retain knowledge beyond the next test and develop critical thinking skills that serve them throughout their lives.

The challenge now is not whether these principles work—decades of research confirm that they do—but rather how we systematically implement them across schools and districts. If we want to maximize student success, we must bridge the gap between cognitive science and classroom instruction. The future of K-12 education depends on it.

Reply

or to participate.